A Greek philosopher of the late 6th century BC, Heraclitus criticizes his predecessors and contemporaries for their failure to see the unity in experience. He claims to announce an everlasting Word (Logos) according to which all things are one, in some sense. Opposites are necessary for life, but they are unified in a system of balanced exchanges. The world itself consists of a law-like interchange of elements, symbolized by fire. Thus the world is not to be identified with any particular substance, but rather with an ongoing process governed by a law of change. The underlying law of nature also manifests itself as a moral law for human beings.
1. LIFE AND TIMES
Heraclitus lived in Ephesus, an important city on the Ionian coast of Asia Minor, not far from Miletus, the birthplace of philosophy. We know nothing about his life other than what can be gleaned from his own statements, for all ancient biographies of him consist of nothing more than inferences or imaginary constructions based on his sayings. Although Plato thought he wrote after Parmenides, it is more likely he wrote before Parmenides. For he criticizes by name important thinkers and writers with whom he disagrees, and he does not mention Parmenides. On the other hand, Parmenides in his poem arguably echoes the words of Heraclitus. Heraclitus criticizes the mythographers Homer and Hesiod, as well as the philosophers Pythagoras and Xenophanes and the historian Hecataeus. All of these figures flourished in the 6th century BC or earlier, suggesting a date for Heraclitus in the late 6th century. Although he does not speak in detail of his political views in the extant fragments, Heraclitus seems to reflect an aristocratic disdain for the masses and favor the rule of a few wise men, for instance when he recommends that his fellow-citizens hang themselves because they have banished their most prominent leader
2. THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE
Heraclitus sees the great majority of human beings as lacking understanding:
Of this Word's being forever do men prove to be uncomprehending, both before they hear and once they have heard it. For although all things happen according to this Word they are like the unexperienced experiencing words and deeds such as I explain when I distinguish each thing according to its nature and declare how it is. Other men are unaware of what they do when they are awake just as they are forgetful of what they do when they are asleep.
Most people sleep-walk through life, not understanding what is going on about them. Yet experience of words and deeds can enlighten those who are receptive to their meaning. (The opening sentence is ambiguous: does the 'forever' go with the preceding or the following words? Heraclitus prefigures the semantic complexity of his message.)
On the one hand, Heraclitus commends sense experience: "The things of which there is sight, hearing, experience, I prefer". On the other hand, "Poor witnesses for men are their eyes and ears if they have barbarian souls". A barbarian is one who does not speak the Greek language. Thus while sense experience seems necessary for understanding, if we do not know the right language, we cannot interpret the information the senses provide. Heraclitus does not give a detailed and systematic account of the respective roles of experience and reason in knowledge. But we can learn something from his manner of expression.
Describing the practice of religious prophets, Heraclitus says, "The Lord whose oracle is at Delphi neither reveals nor conceals, but gives a sign". Similarly, Heraclitus does not reveal or conceal, but produces complex expressions that have encoded in them multiple messages for those who can interpret them. He uses puns, paradoxes, antitheses, parallels, and various rhetorical and literary devices to construct expressions that have meanings beyond the obvious. This practice, together with his emphasis on the Word (Logos) as an ordering principle of the world, suggests that he sees his own expressions as imitations of the world with its structural and semantic complexity. To read Heraclitus the reader must solve verbal puzzles, and to learn to solve these puzzles is to learn to read the signs of the world. Heraclitus stresses the inductive rather than the deductive method of grasping the world, a world that is rationally structured, if we can but discern its shape.
For those who can discern it, the Word has an overriding message to impart: "Listening not to me but to the Word it is wise to agree that all things are one". It is perhaps Heraclitus's chief project to explain in what sense all things are one.
3. THE DOCTRINE OF FLUX AND THE UNITY OF OPPOSITES
According to both Plato and Aristotle, Heraclitus held that:
(1) everything is constantly changing and
(2) opposite things are identical
Plato indicates the source of the flux doctrine:
"Heraclitus, I believe, says that all things go and nothing stays, and comparing existence to the flow of a river, he says you cannot step twice into the same river" .
*********************************************************************************
· Blog, please write a 75-250 word post discussing Heraclitus’s famous quote: "No man ever steps in the same river twice." Your post should speculate on what you believe Heraclitus meant, the implications of this idea, and your opinion of the concept. Be prepared to share your thoughts in class.
19 comments:
In response to the quote, “No man ever steps in the same river twice,” I believe that Heraclitus was trying to say that people change. Heraclitus believed that different life circumstances change a man, not in a physical way but mentally. The river represents stages or problems in life and once you have gotten through a sage or conquered a problem in your own life you might think differently about some things, such as your view about death. For example, if one of your friends was to die you might become scared of death and want to find out more about death which could end up changing your view on death. Having a changed view on death could then influence how you live your life from then on. The Implication on Heraclitus's quote could be that mentally you do not stay the same person throughout your life, your mindset is always changing.
Though it is very unclear as to what this meant, I think that it holds possible meaning in connection with war and siege. Around this time, cities were built around rivers. Rivers were the lifeblood of these ancient cities, and often marked the entrance or border. So by passing over, or stepping into, one of these rivers, you were in a sense stepping into foreign territory. Now the two main reasons to cross over the river would either be to capture the city, or to live in the city. Sometimes both. Nobody really crossed the river only to decide to cross back over again. So during Heraclitus' time in Greece, an army advancing towards one of these cities would most likely find themselves crossing one of these rivers, and let's say the city's defense "kicked butt," then they would suffer the humiliation of turning from battle and fleeing once more across the river. Once this is done, they had an option, cross the river again, or give up. The ancient Greeks held a very high opinion of pride, and having already suffered the embarrassment of fleeing from battle, are less likely to step foot into the river again.
This seems to have been the predecessor of the more meerkat phrase, "lightning never strikes in the same place twice." Let's say that we observed lightening striking a local telephone booth, (if you live in. London) due to that statement of lighting never striking the same place twice, one might assume that the telephone booth is now safe to hide in. Same with the Greeks. Now that they had been attacked once, one must again assume that the attacked city is a cool and safe place to settle down. Well in both of these cases, that one individual is wrong. Science shows that lightning indeed does strike many times in the same spot, so our poor friend in the red box is now a small pile if ashes, and then we know that God has given us free will. So if the Greeks so decide to risk it again, and attack the city (again) then that lone individual is no longer safe in that "cool" city.
However, this being a personal opinion, by looking at the context, one might also conclude that Heraclitus meant that it is physically impossible to step into the EXACT same river more than once. As we know, the definition of a river is "a large natural stream of water flowing from a body of water into the sea." As stated, a river is constantly flowing, it is in a state of perpetual movement and therefore is constantly changing. If we were to look at what Heraclitus believed, then this would prove to be by far the most probable conclusion, due to the fact that he thought that everything was constantly changing, and it was. Bringing back our lone individual, we can see that when he steps into the river, he makes contact with the physical molecules of water. As we know, each Molecule is slightly unique but are all chemically behaving in the same manner. (Back to chemistry class everyone) Now, if a few days had passed, those molecules, that one small portion of water, is now far out in the middle of the ocean. Therefore, when the lone individual once again steps into the river, he is making contact with a completely different set of molecules, in essence, a completely different river in the exact same place, thus proving the statement to be true. You physically cannot step into the same river twice, because it is in a constant state of change.
In conclusion, I not only overshot the word limit, but I also proved the fact that when a sentence is taken out of context, it can take on a completely different meaning.
I agree with Plato. From the information provided by Dr. Parker I believe that what Heraclitus meant by,"No man ever steps in the same river twice." is that the world is changing so much constantly that when a man goes back to a river that he has been to maybe a year ago, it is gone. Even at the top of the web page there is another separate quote by Heraclitus where he says,"There is nothing permanent except change."
Before we try to understand what Heraclitus meant by "no man ever steps in the same river twice" I think we should first understand what the river represents. I think that the river represents the world and how its changing all the time. Now what I think Heraclitus meant is that because the world is constantly changing you can never go through or be in the ExAcT situation or place because the world is constantly changing and not everything is the same. The river is a good example. A river is water that is flowing always now if a man were to step into the river and then get back out and then get back in he would not of just stepped into the same river twice because the water that he first stepped in was moved or changed and new water was in that place when he stepped in the second time. So in conclusion "there is nothing permanent except change"
I believe that he is referring to the fact that things may appear to repeat, but in fact a two different things are happening. Imagine all your experiences you have ever had as a river. Say you step into the river and see a fish egg hatching. This is when you are born. Now step out. Step in again, and you see nothing unusual happen. Step out, step in, and see a clump of dirt fall into the river. Something major has just happened in your life, perhaps the death of someone close. Step out and in, and see nothing unusual. Step out, step in, and still see nothing unusual. Perhaps you've reached a point in your life when nothing special appears to be happening. However, what you don't see is what exactly is in the river. It may appear the same, but the exact chemicals in the river, for example, are different. In addition, the geography of the river has changed--remember that clump of dirt that fell in earlier? Even a small amount of erosion has changed the landscape somewhat. It may appear the same, but no matter how many times you step in the river, it will always be slightly different.
Heraclitus is saying that life is like a flowing river constantly changing. In a river the water is traveling to somewhere else. So you can’t say you have stepped into the same spot of water. Life is the same way. A person can never quite have the same experience twice. The exact time, thoughts and feelings cannot be repeated identically. People change as well. There is no going back on your choices. Time goes on. Life is rushing around you and things will never be exactly how they are today.
“No man ever steps in the same river twice.”
-Heraclitus
This quote from the Greek philosopher implies that everything keeps changing, and though you may go back to the same place over and over it will not be exactly like it was before. Heraclitus is illustrating this idea by comparing change to a river. A river never stops moving and if you step in a flowing river you may step in that exact same spot but you will never step in that same water again. The water you were in before has flowed on and you will never be in it again. So you can step in a river twice, but it will not be the exact same river ever again. This quote says that everything has always been changing and will always continue to change. Nothing that was one way will ever be that way again. I believe that there is truth in this statement, but that there are things that will never change. An example is the fact that God is good, God has always been good, and God always will be good. The goodness of God will not change. Another example is my brother will always be related to me, even if we were never to see each other again, it wouldn’t change that fact that we are related. To conclude Heraclitus thought that everything will always continue to change, and while in some cases this may be true there are exceptions to this statement.
Plato summarized Heraclitus' theology; all things are changing constintally. I would agree with that in interpiting Heraclitus wise, or not so wise, words. What I believe he means is that eerything and everyone is constantly changing, and changing so much that it is impossible to step in the same (Metaphorical) river twice. The river will have different water, or move at a different speed, or more or less objects or inhabitants floating in it. Essentially it is a different river altogether. The same can be true for people and places and ideas. Sure they technically are the same person, but so much about them has changed that it would be impossible to call them, "the same". In conclusion, Heraclitus meant that everything is changing so much, its impossible for anything to stay the same.
I think Heraclitus’ intention behind the quote “no man ever steps in the same river twice” was that in life, everything is constantly changing like a river. One can never have the same experience more than once because situations change and so do people. That little bit of the river is rushed away, shifting into something completely new. The old river can’t be revisited. Stepping in the exact same spot, in the exact same river, will still not give you the same experience as the first time. If one bit of you changes, you are not going to experience things the same way ever again. Time will go on and change is inevitable, like the flowing of a river.
When Heraclitus said “No man ever steps in the same river twice,” he is saying essentially that everything is constantly changing. Obviously this is in reference to the fact that water is constantly moving with the current so it is impossible to step into the same exact arrangement of water twice. Heraclitus believed that nothing is permanent except change. This would mean that no matter what you do, it’s always different from everything else you’ve done, so everything you do is new and never done before. A conclusion we can draw from this is that it’s impossible to learn from experience, since you’ll never be doing the same thing twice. Another implication of this is that God is not constant. That is why I disagree with this idea. The Bible clearly teaches that God is constant, unchanging, and forever. No matter the circumstances, we can learn from what God has to teach us and rely on the fact that he will never change.
“No man ever steps in the same river twice” said the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus. But what does this puzzling phrase mean? I believe that in this quote, Heraclitus is referring to change. No river is ever exactly the same twice. It will have slightly different banks due to erosion and always have different water flowing down its bed. Literally, the river would be changed—a completely different river in a sense. But I think that Heraclitus is referring to more than just rivers here. Even if you believe that you are doing the same thing twice—such as stepping in a river—you never quite are because matter is constantly changing. You can never repeat an action because the environment will have changed by the time you try to repeat it. Although we shall likely never know exactly what was going on in the head of Heraclitus, this is my humble assumption of the thoughts of a philosopher.
I believe that Heraclitus' quote "No man ever steps in the same river twice" is comparing the "river" to any situation or circumstance that you have ever been in.
As we age we encounter all sorts of situations that shape and change us. We can never go back to any exact situation because we would see it in an entirely different light because our worldview changed for either better or for worse.
I think that in this statement of wisdom Heraclitus was trying to warn us to enjoy the present and where we are in the "river" now rather than disregarding our current situation in worries for the future.
As the article says, to be able to understand what Heraclitus is saying, "the reader must solve verbal puzzles". If this quote is take in the physical sense, then it would mean that because a river is always moving and changing, it would be impossible to "step in the same river twice". If this is taken in the more metaphorical sense and used in terms of life experiences, then it would mean this. The river would represent life and therefore mean that life is constantly changing and moving. Think about it, have you ever gone to a place twice and have it be exactly the same as the last time you went? I haven't. It might be very similar where you wouldn't notice it unless you thought about it, but it most likely changed in some way. To Heraclitus, a river would be a very good representation of life because to the agricultural society, it would be the thing that gave them life and sustained them. In conclusion, if taken in the physical or metaphorical sense, this famous quote shows that everything is always changing and moving.
I think that this quote is implying that men change. No man steps in the same river twice is like saying that no man is constant in habits or practice. The implications of this Idea would be that no man was consistent with what he said. Perhaps this Idea came from his own personal experience. I disagree. I think that a person who is solid in there faith in God or Christ will be consistent and will live in the same "river" his whole life. A life rooted in Jesus will be consistent.
By Alicia I mean Josh
Of course
When I first read that quote I thought it was a rather dumb quote, but now that I think about it more, and have read his main theory/idea, it makes more sense. One of Heraclitus' main points was "everything is constantly changing," meaning that "There is nothing permanent except change." A river is always a river as long as it is flowing, and it normally goes by the same name for a long period of time, but it is not always the same river. The molecules of H2O are constantly moving, crashing, tumbling over each other down stream. There may be a 1000 mile long river somewhere, the whole thing in it's entirety being called "Bob," but the whole thing is always changing, just like life.
At first, I was confused by Heraclitus' statement. However, learning his belief that everything is constantly changing (and reading Plato's commentary), brought clarity to this quote. In this metaphor, I think the river stands for existence. If existence is always changing, then anything about our existence will never repeat. Therefore, he is saying in our existence (the river), we will never repeat any part of it (step into it twice). The implications of this idea are quite sad. If everything is always changing in life, we can trust nothing. If all is change, nothing is constant. And for trust to be sustain, the thing we trust must be constant. But if everything is changing, nothing is constant. If then, we believe what Heraclitus says, we can’t trust anything. However, I disagree with this. In life, I believe there are two things which remain 100% constant: God and His Word (the Bible). We can trust these two things. They don’t change.
What I believe Heraclitus means when he says "no man ever steps in the same river twice" is that you will never have the same experience twice. Life is always changing. Even if you step in the same "river" again, it is going to be totally different from the last time you did. I (mostly)agree that we cannot step in the same river twice, even if it is something that we wish we could do. However, we can defiantly learn from our mistakes. Although Heraclitus's quote is mostly true, I disagree with him, when he says that everything about life is changing. Some things will always be the same.
Heraclitus once said "No man ever steps in the same river twice." This comment is quite confusing, but after some thought it seems like Heraclitus was using the river as a metaphor for the past - past mistakes and situations. In other words, it sounds like he was saying that 'no man ever gets a second chance in situation x.' I believe that Heraclitus meant that nobody can go back and take what they said or did back. The past is the past. The implication of this is that what happens happens or what is done is done. You can't go back and step into that same river or situation again. I agree with Heraclitus on this point. We can not ever go back and re-do something we did or said.
Post a Comment